Relationship deals would tend to suggest the timeframe in which amarriage ought to took set

Relationship deals would tend to suggest the timeframe in which amarriage ought to took set

step one. But really, into the genealogy, each of us knowthat per code there is an exemption. A vexing area ofgenealogy would be the fact not one person most understands how to put on the exceptions orrules that have any decisive adjective such as for example usually, maybe, most likely,almost certainly, etc. It will be fascinating in the event the indeed there other instances ofjointures becoming produced a-year or a couple immediately following a known relationship day.

dos. Can there be an extant dispensation to your marriage of ElizabethClifford and you can Sir Ralph Bowes who had been 3rd cousins via Henry Fitzhugh,3rd Lord Fitzhugh or 4th cousins, just after taken off the fresh new fifth LordClifford? That would narrow down their relationship date.


Allegedly, when the a great dispensation try ta en titt på den här webbplatsen needed and you will supplied, it can havebeen by the among adopting the, that can can be found in the new correspondingregister book, if this endures:

Thomas Savage, Archbishop of York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop away from Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop out of York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop out-of Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop away from Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop out of Carlisle 1502-1508John Penny, Bishop out-of Carlisle 1509-1520

5. If your 10th Lord Clifford do marry in early 1487 [say January] andhas E afterwards in that year, really does the brand new chronology maybe not works?

John possession?

E created when you look at the late 1487, Henry created for the 1488/nine, Joan inside ,etc. completing the newest labels of your publish from . If (a) thechronology however works; and you will (b) their own relationships portion was not reasonable; thenwe simply have new 1505 pedigree away from Henry VII’s that is from inside the oppositionto this new conjecture that she try a legitimate child.

6. Regarding the 1505 pedigree: Will be Clifford daughters this new onlyknown Henry VII interactions excluded? Were there anybody else? In this case,won’t you to definitely reflect defectively on this subject file because the a source?

From reviews You will find produced from the new c.1505 Henry VII Affairs pedigreeswith the latest 1480-1500 Visitation of your own Northern pedigrees, which are

Regarding the c.1505 Connections pedigrees, brand new Clifford children are not listedin good Clifford pedigree, but alternatively about St. John pedigree. Because I’mnot always the fresh St. John family members, following the is the pointers asit seems on the c.1505 pedigree, since extracted from the fresh 1834 Coll. Ideal. etGen. article. The latest phrasing inside quotations is strictly whilst appears inthe 1834 post (pp. 310-311).

“No. XII.”Away from my Lord Welles daughter, Sir Richard Rod, Domme Verney, SirJohn St. John, along with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess out-of Somerset got around three husbands.” By the “John Duke ofSomerset” she had “My Lady the new King’s Mother.” who’d “The brand new Queen.” whohad “Prince “By the “Sir Oliver Saint John, earliest spouse.” she got step 3 daus & 2 sons:

An effective. “Edith, wedded so you can Geoffrey Rod of Buckinghamshire.” That they had:A1. “Sir Richard Rod, Knt. married towards Lady Margaret, dau. out-of theDuke off Clarence.” They had: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, wedded so you can Ralph Verney, Esq.” They had: “John Verney.—– [youngster, unnamed]. ——-[a separate child, unnamed].”

B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He’d five students:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” that has “Five daughters and you can oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. in order to Harry Lord Clifford.” They’d “Jane. Mabill.Henry, young buck and you will heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “Elizabeth, wedded to help you Thomas Kent, Esq. out-of Lincolnshire.”B4. “A good Nun away from Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”

C. “Dame Mary, married to help you Sir Richard Frognall.” That they had:C1. “Edmond Frognall and his awesome brethren and sistren.” Having issueindicated, although not named.C2. “E, married in order to Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”

D. “Elizabeth, married very first to the Lord Zouche; once with the LordScrope away from Bolton.” Issue:D1. [by Zouche] ” Catesby.” They’d:”Age. George. John. William.”D2. [by the Scrope] ” Conyers.” Having issueindicated but not named.

Margaret Duchess from Somerset, by “Lionel Lord Welles, history partner.”had: “John Viscount Welles, wedded Cecily, dau. of K. Edward IV.” andthey got “E.”